Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- hse-03 [2021/11/20 05:09] – renick
+++ hse-03 [2021/11/20 07:06] (current) – renick
@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 TOPLAP: "Show us your screens!" https://toplap.org/
+a typical live coding improvisation with text communication with the audience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXuLsLV20bw
 - visual openness (superficial?)
@@ Line 68: / Line 70: @@
 {{:fis-and-renick-bell-berlin-atonal-2017-_-camille-blake-1-1.jpg?800|}}
-photo by Camille Blake
+Fis and Renick Bell live at Berlin Atonal festival, photo by Camille Blake
 {{:renick-soup-algorave-151010-01-edit.jpg?800|}}
@@ Line 119: / Line 121: @@
     - need for an openness in society
     - society is increasingly mediated by algorithms
+        - supply chain: Walmart, Carre Four, gasoline distribution, etc.
+        - not necessarily dystopic:
+            - Allende, Project Cybersyn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn
+            - Towards a New Socialism (book) http://users.wfu.edu/cottrell/socialism_book/
     - problems caused by a lack of transparency
     - ignorance of algorithms means ignorance of the basic relations of society
+        - Facebook, Twitter, etc. timeline algos
+        - credit systems, face recognition etc. for crime prevention
+    - algorithmic bias/discrimination: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/2/18/21121286/algorithms-bias-discrimination-facial-recognition-transparency
     - ignorance of algorithms leads to a sense of powerlessness
-    - what new relationships does open algorithmic art expose or suggest
+    - Eco says open works suggest new forms of organization and relationship. what new relationships does open algorithmic art expose or suggest?
-    - by exposing algorithms and showing how they can be beautiful, the understandability and tractability of algorithms shows new possibilities to an audience: "i could do this," "i could control an algorithm," and therefore shows possibility of agency that wasn't previously held for non-programmers
+    - by exposing algorithms and showing how they can be beautiful, the understand-ability and tractability of algorithms shows new possibilities to an audience: "i could do this," "i could control an algorithm," and therefore shows possibility of agency that wasn't previously held for non-programmers
     - even for programmers, the repurposing of the algorithmic tools for art also shows new possibilities
     - foregrounding the algorithm then emphasizes these possibilities
@@ Line 148: / Line 157: @@
 paradox: how can a rational algorithmic system which encapsulates logical concepts lead to radical intuitive open connection?
 it's the ineffable paradox of duality expressed in the tao te ching: accepting limits in order to be limitless
 openness, receptiveness, "know the male yet keep to the female"
@@ Line 155: / Line 165: @@
 ===== conclusions, questions, discussion =====
+katya:
+I think that the main difficulty of the auditory engagement is that while you are playing on computer u kinda incorporated the computer algorithsystem. So you act as a part or of the computer logic. And in my oppinion the musician is totaly sepated from the audience in this situation. He operates in kinda artifitial audible bubble detached from the sonic continuum and the perception experience shared with the audience.  (I also connect it with the primat of visual, as the musician is to be monitoring the labtop screen while playing.)
+renick:
+assuming this is a problem in achieving one's purpose, what strategies could the performer use to change the situation or otherwise overcome it?
+evegeniy bylina:
+https://monoskop.org/images/7/73/Kittler_Friedrich_Gramophone_Film_Typewriter.pdf