Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
hse-03 [2021/11/20 04:57] – renick | hse-03 [2021/11/20 07:06] (current) – renick | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | photo by Camille Blake | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Harvard University Press. | Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Harvard University Press. | ||
+ | |||
+ | influenced by Dewey, Croce | ||
[[eco-open-notes|some points from chapters 1-4 of The Open Work]] | [[eco-open-notes|some points from chapters 1-4 of The Open Work]] | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
- pragmatic aesthetic theory | - pragmatic aesthetic theory | ||
- all works are inherently open (Croce, emphasized by Eco) | - all works are inherently open (Croce, emphasized by Eco) | ||
- | - intedeterminacy, observed in quantum physics, reflected into artistic work (p. 14-15) | + | - indeterminacy, observed in quantum physics, reflected into artistic work (p. 14-15) |
- " | - " | ||
- " | - " | ||
- | - consciousness is an infintely | + | - consciousness is an infinitely |
- our pragmatic aesthetic theory is described as " | - our pragmatic aesthetic theory is described as " | ||
- " | - " | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
- more radical when the audience collaborates with the composer in making the composition (p. 12), as well as works which are incomplete and constituted of structural units, " | - more radical when the audience collaborates with the composer in making the composition (p. 12), as well as works which are incomplete and constituted of structural units, " | ||
+ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | ===== algorithmic openness ===== | ||
+ | a typical closed electronic music performance (Plastikman at Sonar) | ||
+ | {{: | ||
- | | + | TOPLAP: "Show us your screens!" |
- | + | a typical live coding improvisation with text communication with the audience: https:// | |
- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ===== algorithmic openness ===== | + | |
- visual openness (superficial? | - visual openness (superficial? | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fis and Renick Bell live at Berlin Atonal festival, photo by Camille Blake | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
Line 118: | Line 121: | ||
- need for an openness in society | - need for an openness in society | ||
- society is increasingly mediated by algorithms | - society is increasingly mediated by algorithms | ||
+ | - supply chain: Walmart, Carre Four, gasoline distribution, | ||
+ | - not necessarily dystopic: | ||
+ | - Allende, Project Cybersyn: https:// | ||
+ | - Towards a New Socialism (book) http:// | ||
- problems caused by a lack of transparency | - problems caused by a lack of transparency | ||
- ignorance of algorithms means ignorance of the basic relations of society | - ignorance of algorithms means ignorance of the basic relations of society | ||
+ | - Facebook, Twitter, etc. timeline algos | ||
+ | - credit systems, face recognition etc. for crime prevention | ||
+ | - algorithmic bias/ | ||
- ignorance of algorithms leads to a sense of powerlessness | - ignorance of algorithms leads to a sense of powerlessness | ||
- | - what new relationships does open algorithmic art expose or suggest | + | - Eco says open works suggest new forms of organization and relationship. |
- | - by exposing algorithms and showing how they can be beautiful, the understandability | + | - by exposing algorithms and showing how they can be beautiful, the understand-ability |
- even for programmers, | - even for programmers, | ||
- foregrounding the algorithm then emphasizes these possibilities | - foregrounding the algorithm then emphasizes these possibilities | ||
Line 147: | Line 157: | ||
paradox: how can a rational algorithmic system which encapsulates logical concepts lead to radical intuitive open connection? | paradox: how can a rational algorithmic system which encapsulates logical concepts lead to radical intuitive open connection? | ||
+ | |||
it's the ineffable paradox of duality expressed in the tao te ching: accepting limits in order to be limitless | it's the ineffable paradox of duality expressed in the tao te ching: accepting limits in order to be limitless | ||
openness, receptiveness, | openness, receptiveness, | ||
Line 154: | Line 165: | ||
===== conclusions, | ===== conclusions, | ||
+ | katya: | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think that the main difficulty of the auditory engagement is that while you are playing on computer u kinda incorporated the computer algorithsystem. So you act as a part or of the computer logic. And in my oppinion the musician is totaly sepated from the audience in this situation. He operates in kinda artifitial audible bubble detached from the sonic continuum and the perception experience shared with the audience. | ||
+ | |||
+ | renick: | ||
+ | |||
+ | assuming this is a problem in achieving one's purpose, what strategies could the performer use to change the situation or otherwise overcome it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | evegeniy bylina: | ||
+ | |||
+ | https:// |